Unless you are aware of the extent of technical debt that is being introduced in order to meet the production timelines, it is all too easy to end up being surprised by very expensive extended cycles of refactoring in consequence. Or the fishing area is too shallow to get a wide enough read to show more than just a couple feet wide, unless there's a fast drop-off near shore.ĭiscussions said It can be helpful on a kayak/John Boats if it doesn't have the opportunity to connect a real fish finder (Humminbird or Lowrance) they're much more accurate than these casting types.īut again, at this price point the Garmin is really the only competitor in this realm as all others are about $100+ more and in the terms of SDers anything 200%+ in price isn't really in the same realm of products.It is always important to get an objective idea of the quality of the code that is being checked into source control within a development team, especially as a reminder to yourself when you check in something that isn’t completely right. However, on Reddit and other fishing forums the heavy discussion was these devices aren't super helpful when bank/shore fishing as the current quickly moves it around not being able to get a great read of the area. It's output is much more accurate and a tri-beam technology over Garmin/Deeper Pro+ dual beam. However, Deeper Chirp 2 is the model that everyone raves about being better than Garmin (and Deeper Pro+). The Garmin Striker can get results quickly to know what may be down there and has good map support with being Garmin, but it's difficult to get a good picture.but at the price point it's the best product out there. I researched the crap out of these several months ago when looking to ask for it for Christmas.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |